Two fellow countrymen and surgeons, William Camps and Thomas Buzzard, had also published brief essays on the subject of railway accidents. Erichsen was certainly not the only physician of his day to focus on the particular medical issues raised by railway injuries. Gosling concentrates on the role of neurasthenia, and Hoopes explores the distinctions between functional and structural notions of disease that informed the debate.ġ2. Trimble provides a more rigorous discussion of some of the primary medical texts on the subject. Drinka and Schivelbusch offer some interesting cultural speculations. None goes substantially beyond this discourse, however. Together these works provide a fairly accurate, albeit general, discussion of the neurological discourse on the subject of railway spine. Brown, ''Regulating Damage Claims for Emotional Injuries before the First World War,"Ĩ7-88. (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981) Gosling,Ģ43-244 Edward M. Post-Traumatic Neurosis: From Railway Spine to Whiplash Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 184, 192-193 Thomas Keller, "Railway Spine Revisited: Traumatic Neurosis or Neuro-trauma," Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), 107-119 Young, Occupation and Disease: How Social Factors Affect the Conception of Work-related Disorders See Eric Caplan, "Trains, Brains, and Sprains: Railway Spine and the Origins of Psychoneuroses,"Ħ9 (1995): 387-419 Ralph Harrington, "The Neuroses of the Railway,"Ĥ4 (1994): 15-21 idem, "The 'Railway Spine' Diagnosis and Victorian Response to PTSD," Although there are literally scores of books and articles devoted to the history and cultural significance of neurasthenia, there are only a small number of English-language works that consider the subject of railway spine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |